4 ms·

I don't understand why this is often portrayed negatively. In general it's important that people can defend their rights, and I find it great that LLMs can help

I don't understand why this is often portrayed negatively. In general it's important that people can defend their rights, and I find it great that LLMs can help a lot with that. One could introduce page/word/character limits, and note that the other side can use LLMs too to summarize/organize/extract. Overall I think it's great that LLMs now help me to understand and rightfully claim things from insurances, companies, etc.

groestl 1mo ago
To be fair, the source mentions the upside ("Although improving Service accessibility is beneficial [...]") Seems like bureaucracy was added as a subtle way to introduce rate limits, and AI is challenging that mechanism.
- mistrial9 1mo ago
  > Seems like bureaucracy was added as NOT a subtle way to introduce rate limits some teams get incentives when the total awards go down in a stable, badly run bureaucracy.. this is real
QuadmasterXLII 1mo ago
LLMs are a magic machine to turn commons into tragedies.
- nonethewiser 1mo ago
  Great quote. Good luck trying to get your book published. Or run an open source repo from community contributions.
maccard 1mo ago
Imagine if every time someone reached out to you to ask you a question they did a SAR for all of the information you had on them. They’re technically entitled to do that in many jurisdictions, but it probably won’t help with getting the answer to the question. It’s the same problem as drive by AI PRs except the people receiving them aren’t allowed to ignore them.
nonethewiser 1mo ago
>I don't understand why this is often portrayed negatively. In general it's important that people can defend their rights, and I find it great that LLMs can help a lot with that. Well I thought it was self evident. It’s portrayed negatively because it causes a denial of service. You should view this positively if you want worse access to public benefits.

groestl 1mo ago

To be fair, the source mentions the upside ("Although improving Service accessibility is beneficial [...]") Seems like bureaucracy was added as a subtle way to introduce rate limits, and AI is challenging that mechanism.

mistrial9 1mo ago
> Seems like bureaucracy was added as NOT a subtle way to introduce rate limits some teams get incentives when the total awards go down in a stable, badly run bureaucracy.. this is real

QuadmasterXLII 1mo ago

LLMs are a magic machine to turn commons into tragedies.

nonethewiser 1mo ago
Great quote. Good luck trying to get your book published. Or run an open source repo from community contributions.

maccard 1mo ago

Imagine if every time someone reached out to you to ask you a question they did a SAR for all of the information you had on them. They’re technically entitled to do that in many jurisdictions, but it probably won’t help with getting the answer to the question. It’s the same problem as drive by AI PRs except the people receiving them aren’t allowed to ignore them.

nonethewiser 1mo ago

>I don't understand why this is often portrayed negatively. In general it's important that people can defend their rights, and I find it great that LLMs can help a lot with that. Well I thought it was self evident. It’s portrayed negatively because it causes a denial of service. You should view this positively if you want worse access to public benefits.