3 ms·

Yes, I'm sure AI boosters are in shambles.

• tkel 2mo ago
  If not then why do they get so upset here on every similar thread? Complaining about "anti-AI"
  • Slurpee99 2mo ago
    Strawman for a third time, might as well keep them coming!
  • cobertos 2mo ago
    Perhaps they can't or refuse to consider ethical arguments surrounding it? It's just tech as-is to them, without externalities (which is disingenuous). Feels like a language limitation to me. It is hard to describe succinctly the complexities of AI use that preserve a human element or recognizes externalities. The wording is not immediately obvious and require subtlety that I rarely see in HN, unless it's about the tech itself and it's minutae. Curious to see if HN could have any kind of thoughtful conversation on it but so far I haven't seen one.
  • binary132 2mo ago
    [flagged]
• matsemann 2mo ago
  Yet, here you are, commenting :)
  • azan_ 2mo ago
    In jovial mood, not in shambles though.
    • tkel 2mo ago
      You're still doing the thing where you make defensive comments though, just now pretending it's about something tangential
      • azan_ 2mo ago
        What? I think you must be replying to wrong comment or something.
    • archagon 2mo ago
      """jovial"""
      • azan_ 2mo ago
        ?
• florkbork 2mo ago
  They will be, if they can't find accountability sinks. https://www.commonplace.org/p/reining-in-the-unaccountability-machine https://www.commonplace.org/p/reining-in-the-unaccountabilit... In this case this person was "responsible for getting five- to 12-year-olds to play football in the Hunter region". She would have the occasional exposure to children, market to them, gather statistics and survey them. She asked if she could not expose this group to AI and the answer was "no".