4 ms·

[stub for offtopicness] (We've since changed the top link.)

by dang 2mo ago

deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
Supermancho 2mo ago
paywalled (even with a "free" account")
- deleted 2mo ago
  [deleted]
- missedthecue 2mo ago
  Cancer Flight attendants Pilots ------------------------------------------------------ All radiation-related 1.50x 1.36x Breast cancer 1.61x 1.57x CNS / brain cancer 1.51x 1.28x Multiple myeloma 1.34x 1.08x Leukemia 1.12x 1.27x Lymphoma 1.19x 1.04x Prostate cancer 1.75x 1.38x Melanoma 1.63x 1.28x Nonmelanoma skin cancer 1.50x 1.22x Other cancers 1.21x 0.97x It was a cross-sectional analysis of U.S. death certificates from 2020-2024, covering ~13 million deaths across 503 occupations, including roughly 14,000 pilots and 7,000 flight attendants. The analysis adjusted for age at death, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and marital status. So in other words, breast cancer was the cause of death at a rate 61% higher for flight attendants than for the comparison population of other occupations.
  - francisofascii 2mo ago
    I suspect they don't have regular sleep schedules, which partially explains the elevated risk. Nurses and 3rd shift workers all have elevated cancer risk.
  - leonidasrup 2mo ago
    It's bad we don't access to the full study, because we could learn more about the methodology. Did the study adjust for socio-economic factors? The average income of pilots is much higher then average income of flight attendants, income affects lifestyle which affect cancer rates and access to healthcare. When comparing occupations, how do the rates of cancer of pilots/flight attendants compare to miners, especially underground miners? Miners got quite lot of radiation exposure from radon in certain regions. How about workers in chemical plants?
- Mistletoe 2mo ago
  It’s wild I can’t even read the abstract to understand what they found.
  - estetlinus 2mo ago
    The abstract is clickbait. What the hell?
    - hughw 2mo ago
      You won't believe what we found!
  - moioci 2mo ago
    It's a research letter, not a full article. Accordingly, there's no abstract. They just show the first of 11 paragraphs as a teaser.
- MoonWalk 2mo ago
  Yep. Your time is FREEEEE!
deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
MoonWalk 2mo ago
Paywalled garbage, even if you waste your time "signing up."

[stub for offtopicness] (We've since changed the top link.)

by dang 2mo ago

[stub for offtopicness] (We've since changed the top link.)

deleted 2mo ago

[deleted]

Supermancho 2mo ago

paywalled (even with a "free" account")

deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
missedthecue 2mo ago
Cancer Flight attendants Pilots ------------------------------------------------------ All radiation-related 1.50x 1.36x Breast cancer 1.61x 1.57x CNS / brain cancer 1.51x 1.28x Multiple myeloma 1.34x 1.08x Leukemia 1.12x 1.27x Lymphoma 1.19x 1.04x Prostate cancer 1.75x 1.38x Melanoma 1.63x 1.28x Nonmelanoma skin cancer 1.50x 1.22x Other cancers 1.21x 0.97x It was a cross-sectional analysis of U.S. death certificates from 2020-2024, covering ~13 million deaths across 503 occupations, including roughly 14,000 pilots and 7,000 flight attendants. The analysis adjusted for age at death, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and marital status. So in other words, breast cancer was the cause of death at a rate 61% higher for flight attendants than for the comparison population of other occupations.
- francisofascii 2mo ago
  I suspect they don't have regular sleep schedules, which partially explains the elevated risk. Nurses and 3rd shift workers all have elevated cancer risk.
- leonidasrup 2mo ago
  It's bad we don't access to the full study, because we could learn more about the methodology. Did the study adjust for socio-economic factors? The average income of pilots is much higher then average income of flight attendants, income affects lifestyle which affect cancer rates and access to healthcare. When comparing occupations, how do the rates of cancer of pilots/flight attendants compare to miners, especially underground miners? Miners got quite lot of radiation exposure from radon in certain regions. How about workers in chemical plants?
Mistletoe 2mo ago
It’s wild I can’t even read the abstract to understand what they found.
- estetlinus 2mo ago
  The abstract is clickbait. What the hell?
  - hughw 2mo ago
    You won't believe what we found!
- moioci 2mo ago
  It's a research letter, not a full article. Accordingly, there's no abstract. They just show the first of 11 paragraphs as a teaser.
MoonWalk 2mo ago
Yep. Your time is FREEEEE!

deleted 2mo ago

[deleted]

MoonWalk 2mo ago

Paywalled garbage, even if you waste your time "signing up."