3 ms·
Well then it’s not financially worth it for capable people to work for that company. And of story
by gmerc 2mo ago
Well then it’s not financially worth it for capable people to work for that company. And of story
- charcircuit 2mo agoNot all capable people are willing to reject a company because they upload their resume to an automated system than giving it to a human to talk with.
- inigyou 2mo agoIt's every company. If you reject companies for this, you are living under a bridge right now.
- disgruntledphd2 1mo ago> It's every company. If you reject companies for this, you are living under a bridge right now. I just finished a successful job search, and only had 1 company (of maybe 50 applications) try this.
- gmerc 2mo agoAmericans are uniquely (c|f)ucked that way because, lol regulation would be worse
- psd1 1mo agoI think it's happening everywhere, even in places with strong worker protection laws. Applicants aren't workers, and regulation is anyway laggy.
- inigyou 2mo agoWell then it's not financially worth it to have a job, because every company does this because if they didn't they'd need to triple in size with recruiters. Something must be wrong with this logic because it clearly is financially worth it to have a job.
- Pooge 2mo ago> it clearly is financially worth it to have a job Yes, for the company.
- disgruntledphd2 1mo ago> Well then it's not financially worth it to have a job, because every company does this because if they didn't they'd need to triple in size with recruiters. Every company does not do this. I always refuse tasks like this unless I've talked to a human before hand, as unless the company has invested a little effort, then I won't invest any effort.