3 ms·
the history has demonstrated these are Republican problems. Democrats are shit for other things, but not for fisical stupidity like cutting taxes and rasing sp
by cyanydeez 2mo ago
the history has demonstrated these are Republican problems.
Democrats are shit for other things, but not for fisical stupidity like cutting taxes and rasing spending.
- Georgelemental 2mo ago[flagged]
- seanmcdirmid 2mo agoNo, republicans have always raised spending more than democrats. They just have no impulse control, and only worry about the budget when a Democrat is in charge.
- copper-float 2mo ago[flagged]
- thunderfork 2mo agothis is a fact you can look up
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- nomel 2mo agoWhy does nobody post references anymore!? These are simple facts that nobody should be arguing about. https://www.investopedia.com/democrats-vs-republicans-who-had-more-national-debt-8738104 https://www.investopedia.com/democrats-vs-republicans-who-ha... > Republican presidents added about $1.4 trillion per four-year term, compared to $1.2 trillion added by Democrats since 1913. > Democratic presidents have added a total of $18 trillion to the national debt since 1913 (adjusted for inflation), while Republicans have added $17.3 trillion So everyone downvoting and flagging people saying it's a problem with both parties should be ashamed. Tribalism is stupid.
- cyanydeez 2mo agolmgtfy and ask chatgpt; if you cant' ascertain the truth of this statement you live in a delusion.
- nomel 2mo agoSure, but with a reference, you can have an argument about the topic, based on facts, rather than an argument about the delusions (looking at the adjacent comments, that's what this was). I don't think the later is appropriate for HN.