3 ms·

This is not real life.

• xhkkffbf 1mo ago
  Different rules for the rulers and the proles has been a big part of life on Earth for eternity. Why shouldn't we be surprised that this judge thinks it's okay to do things that a grade schooler can't.
  • freejazz 1mo ago
    The way to challenge a judge's opinion is to appeal it, not personally sue the judge. These responses are histrionic and misinformed.
    • FireBeyond 1mo ago
      Appeals are not automatic. Another judge has to decide whether you have standing to appeal - you can't just say "don't like the result, redo!"
      • zdragnar 1mo ago
        Right, there needs to be procedural grounds for appeal, and this case is entirely about the judge violating procedural rules by delegating away their judgement. It's a perfect example of a case for an appeals court.
      • AngryData 1mo ago
        Doesn't seem that way for people with money though.
      • freejazz 1mo ago
        Yes, and? Lawsuits aren't automatic and you can't just say "don't like the result, redo!" in them either.
    • TMatthewPhillip 1mo ago
      Appeals are designed to correct "errors of law." However, in this case, there were no "errors of law." Hence, nothing to appeal. :)