3 ms·
Arguing that the IPCC report is "downplaying the impact" because of corruption -- which is what you seem to be doing, without evidence -- is an implausible asse
by timr 2mo ago
Arguing that the IPCC report is "downplaying the impact" because of corruption -- which is what you seem to be doing, without evidence -- is an implausible assertion.
The far more likely conclusion is that you're wrong.
- js8 2mo agoThey are not saying what the cause of the "downplay" is. It might be as simple as when scientists speaks publicly and present a consensus, they will stay on the safe side and give conservative estimates.
- timr 2mo agoAgain, the parsimonious conclusion is that you are exaggerating, and wrong.