6 ms·
If it gets you paid, it's good data. If it makes your clients happy, it's good data. Business data is for business purposes, not for science purposes.
by brudgers 2mo ago
If it gets you paid, it's good data.
If it makes your clients happy, it's good data.
Business data is for business purposes, not for science purposes.
- rtkwe 2mo ago> Business data is for business purposes I mean isn't the business purpose for the company running the ad campaign to actually increase revenue? Sure for an outside ad company just making the client happy is sufficient but for internal teams and the customer themselves the data is still bad.
- scroblart 2mo agosure, but generally most businesses do wish to pay for fraudulent activity. It seems we have reached a point in time where many "business people" seem unable to discern a difference between fraud and not-fraud, but whichever businesses those people are responsible for will not be sustainable enterprises in the long term.
- graceful6800 2mo agoThe fraud/not-fraud axis is wholly irrelevant once you consider that the profitable/not-profitable axis exists in a vacuum detached from all reality.
- dsjoerg 2mo agoSome people are in business to get paid by creating actual real value all the way down the chain to the ultimate customer. Those people are the ones you'd rather work for, and those are the ones who will care about "science purposes".
- krageon 2mo agoWhile in the abstract a great thought, this mindset in aggregate is why our children will end up living in hell.