2 ms·
_Tools_ have a response to this post.
by riazrizvi 2mo ago
_Tools_ have a response to this post.
- ChrisClark 2mo agois this a broken AI bot?
- ricree 2mo agoLooks like, though a shame if true, since the account is more than 10 years old and presumably had a person behind it at some point.
- orangedog 2mo agoWhat suggests that it is?
- krapp 2mo ago"_Tools_ have a response to this post" is not a sensible comment that a human would likely make. It reads like a prompt to an AI accidentally pasted into the wrong place.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- orangedog 2mo agoIt is terse but the comment is sensible to me.
- krapp 2mo agoOK, what does "_Tools_ have a response to this post" mean to you, in the context of the posted article, and as a response to it? Why would a human being organically reply to the article with that sentence?
- baltoo 2mo agotools as an artifact can be contraposed to art as artifact? the juxtaposition hints to a challenge of the article's claims about the dualities of art?
- riazrizvi 2mo agoYou've lost the plot old chap. Time to go outside and smell the fresh air, get some exercise, talk to a human person.
- shimman 2mo agoThere's a lot of archaeological evidence that art + toys were made before tools by a good amount of time IIRC. It makes sense to me as humans were always social creative creatures and the ideas that we didn't want to express ourselves 300,000 years ago seems kinda silly.