4 ms·
it weaves an imperceptible watermark directly into the text itself. You won’t see it, and it doesn’t change the meaning, quality, or readability of Claude’s res
by bediger4000 2mo ago
it weaves an imperceptible watermark directly into the text itself. You won’t see it, and it doesn’t change the meaning, quality, or readability of Claude’s response
That's John Gruber quoting Anthropic. Gruber's completely correct on this one. Either there's non printable Unicode characters, or the word choice is biased, and the Anthropic statement is lies.
Does Anthropic really think they can claim magic and everyone will just accept it, or have they spent too long communing with Mr Flattery and can no longer distinguish reality from fantasy?
- perfmode 2mo agoAnthropic is saying the word choice is biased without affecting readability and meaning.
- throwaway27448 2mo agoThat still seems trivial to strip out and/or launder. Seems like theater for those who are immaterially concerned (in this case, the EU).
- bediger4000 2mo agoI don't see how that's possible especially for shorter blocks of text.
- perfmode 2mo agoare you a cryptographer?