3 ms·
OpenAI was probably able to at least pretend that her role mattered... until they let their AI autonomously hack a rival company, then used the incident to scor
by wavemode 2mo ago
OpenAI was probably able to at least pretend that her role mattered... until they let their AI autonomously hack a rival company, then used the incident to score marketing points. I'm not surprised she left.
- mvkel 2mo ago[flagged]
- AnimalMuppet 2mo agoWhat if you actually told us, instead of just asking a question? If you have something to say, say it. Don't vaguepost.
- Brajeshwar 2mo ago“When you have to shoot, shoot; don’t talk.” — Ugly
- teddyh 2mo agoHis name is Tuco Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez, a.k.a. “The Rat”.
- testbjjl 2mo agoYou would be creating a counterfactual inconsistent with most’s understanding of the role and bringing this person’s motives and credibility into question without supporting evidence?
- blitzar 2mo agoIt would be deeply unethical to manufacture an incident to grab some headlines about how amazing your hacking machine really is.
- nozzlegear 2mo agoThen do it. Tell us. Spill the tea and provide your evidence, don't just vaguely gesture at something behind the curtains like you're discount Morpheus.
- InsideOutSanta 2mo agoWhat if I told you that I saw you punch a baby?
- KennyBlanken 2mo agoI doubt she and others left just because of this one incident. My guess is that OpenAI has been doing more and more domestic spying type work as well as more and more military work - target selection and the like. That's how the schoolhouse was blown up by a Tomahawk. An AI was fed old information, didn't realize or do proper validation, an analyst copy-pasted, then someone just punched the coordinates into the their control station and hit "fire". It also wouldn't surprise me if OpenAI et al are being pressured to work with Israelis for targeting and analysis, too, since their "black box" AI that was doing terrorist acid tests and assigning bombing targets has proven nearly useless.
- smcg 2mo agoThe schoolhouse was an intentional target - the children of some military leaders went there. They triple-tapped the school hoping to kill parents going in to save the kids.
- reducesuffering 2mo agocitation needed
- Planktonne 2mo agoWhy only ask for citations of one side's claims?
- reducesuffering 2mo agoBecause the other side is the general informed consensus for which multiple sources are readily available for me to find. I have seen nothing to indicate this side, hence I'm asking for any evidence, because I don't see it. Either could potentially be correct, but I don't think they're equally probable.
- Planktonne 2mo agoTo the extent there is a consensus here, it's not an evidence-based one; it's entirely founded on untested statements made by people who have both a track record of lying and incentive to do so. Demanding evidence from one party while accepting the word of the other is not even-handed.