4 ms·
We have a greenfield project at our company, yes proprietary, now taking us months where previously it'd have taken weeks for even a single feature. We definite
by satvikpendem 2mo ago
We have a greenfield project at our company, yes proprietary, now taking us months where previously it'd have taken weeks for even a single feature. We definitely see the (whatever)x performance boost with our own eyes.
- vatsachak 2mo ago> now taking us months where it'd have taken weeks... So 0<whatever<1
- marcosdumay 2mo agoNah, the GP's claim is weeks for each feature, versus a few months in total. On a greenfield project. Weeks for each feature in a greenfield project... Yeah, LLMs make unworking code way faster than that.
- satvikpendem 2mo agoFeature vs full project timeline
- 20k 2mo agoIts always been possible to trade long term productivity for short term gains with technical debt. This is why the bar I'm interested in is long term projects, which have proven to have long term success, instead of a small disposable project where the code quality doesn't matter
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- satvikpendem 2mo agoDifference is whether it's a false dichotomy now, because models like Fable can write better code than most devs I know.
- 20k 2mo agoThen why isn't it showing up in open source at all? The people who file PRs are just regular average devs, but the quality of LLM PRs seems to be universally crap in comparison
- satvikpendem 2mo agoIt is: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49237476 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49237476