3 ms·
>So because you have an anecdote, I must be lying? It's called common sense. You asked what my experience is. I know you're lying because you don't pass the sn
by freejazz 2mo ago
>So because you have an anecdote, I must be lying?
It's called common sense. You asked what my experience is. I know you're lying because you don't pass the sniff test and you're a well known troll here.
>My story was about landlord-tenant mediation. Do you think those involve straightforward, "best case" proceedings? The assertion above was that "many" people are "one missed paycheck away from homelessness." If someone's alternative is homelessness, then the eviction proceeding won't be a straightforward, uncontested proceeding. And the law gives tenants many opportunities to drag out proceedings.
Doesn't really matter, your own link provides the average. You citing to what your own link describes as scenarios that will not happen to any land lord just show how dishonest you are in your own framing.
>What about that sentence shows that case length is "mostly dependent upon the landlord?" Walk me through it?
Maybe read your link... the "What Speeds the Timeline Up" section up should help
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- rayiner 2mo ago> It's called common sense. Is it common sense, or your preconceptions? > Doesn't really matter, your own link provides the average. The “average” eviction doesn’t result in homelessness, so why are you focusing on that? You have to actually follow the conversation. We’re not talking about how long eviction proceedings take. We’re talking about the assertion that people are one missed paycheck away from “homelessness.” In that context, you need to look at how long eviction takes for people who are otherwise facing homelessness.
- freejazz 2mo ago[flagged]