4 ms·

I don't think they said that at all. I'm pretty sure they were saying that the thing to think about / discuss is the thing that happened, rather than the hypoth

• estearum 2mo ago
  My own initial comment literally addressed the uncertainty. Here: > You can argue about whether the obsolescence is real or not, but if it is [emphasis in source], the plight of the printers is totally incomparable. "It hasn't happened yet" is a non-sequitur at best, but obviously the goal of such a "contribution" is to chill discussion. The same "contribution" can be made to any conversation about any possible future events. So long as everyone already knows they're talking about the future, it is not helpful in any way.
• freejazz 2mo ago
  The entire premise of this article is a hypothetical