4 ms·
It should be the same as for any public transport: it's the service operator's responsibility to run the system. The rider doesn't need insurance. I imagine Go
by skybrian 2mo ago
It should be the same as for any public transport: it's the service operator's responsibility to run the system. The rider doesn't need insurance.
I imagine Google has enough money that they can self-insure. Particularly since it's a very low accident rate.
- vb-8448 2mo agoWhat about criminal implications? PS: i guess the insurance on self diving cars is a little bit different and the accident rate is only part of the picture. Just an example: humans don't get hacked.
- xnx 2mo agoSimilar legal profile to an elevator when they stopped being operated by people.
- SR2Z 2mo agoI would imagine that criminal liability for hacking a Waymo falls on the hacker, and on Waymo only if they are negligent.
- surajrmal 2mo agoIf someone holds a gun to your head and tells you to run a red light, who is liable? Humans can get persuaded to do illegal things by criminals just as well.
- ssl-3 2mo agoCriminal implications of... what, exactly? Please state your concerns.