4 ms·

Really don't like all the drama around this. Should be dealt with in court, not tried in the press. Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case

by datakan 2mo ago

Really don't like all the drama around this. Should be dealt with in court, not tried in the press. Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels.

6gvONxR4sf7o 2mo ago
Seems to be Altman's playbook, just like how he got the CEO job back.
- deleted 2mo ago
  [deleted]
eagerpace 2mo ago
This, and the books, and the government contracts, and the distillation… It’s like that one friend who complains how drama always finds them and they are clueless why.
deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
georgemcbay 2mo ago
> Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. This isn't a "both sides" situation. OpenAI is posting drama blog posts. Apple isn't doing that. "Apple says" in the headline here actually means: Apple filed for a preliminary injunction with the court and since that is a public record we are reporting the contents of it.
sublinear 2mo ago
It's OpenAI still trying to maintain control of the narrative while they burn to the ground. For years they haven't really delivered while bullying anyone who doesn't have an "AI strategy". The media is happy to stoke the flames.
freejazz 2mo ago
>Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. Why? Apple surely doesn't want to and why should they?
- thewebguyd 2mo ago
  Huh? Apple is literally working through legal channels, the article is pulled from the court filings which are public record. OpenAI is the one making blog posts.
VCFundedGenYer 2mo ago
Why are you both-sidesing this? Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements. OpenAI is acting like a teenager posting screenshots of literal texts and being overall petulant. This is open and shut. The mature company will win this.
- solfox 2mo ago
  The lady doth protest too much, methinks
- liamgm 2mo ago
  Nah , OpenAI doing it right , defending its interest and valuable employee with both legal and public from competing company negative oppinion.
- deleted 2mo ago
  [deleted]
- lightedman 2mo ago
  "Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements." Apple does this to most any company that ends up with any of its former employees. It's basically expected. Apple is being the bully.
- tjwebbnorfolk 2mo ago
  Looking at things from multiple perspectives and trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice. I really hate that "both-sides" has become a copy-paste insult by ideologues.
  - crazygringo 2mo ago
    It's a virtue when there is validity to both sides. But it's extremely harmful when there isn't. "Alice says murder is bad, while Bob says murder is a fun and healthy recreational activity. Trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice." See, it doesn't work.
    - 2mo ago
madeofpalk 2mo ago
I mean, they are dealing with it in the courts, right? This is the press picking up on public court filings https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73602437/49/apple-inc-v-liu/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73602437/49/apple-inc-v...
devsda 2mo ago
The whole affair and the blog post feels like proxy signal to potential investors from OpenAI that they have now developed/acquired tech that is worth enough to grab Apple's attention ?
nrmitchi 2mo ago
"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither, pound the table." It's 2026; we can probably update "pound the table" to "pound social media"

by datakan 2mo ago

Really don't like all the drama around this. Should be dealt with in court, not tried in the press. Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels.

6gvONxR4sf7o 2mo ago

Seems to be Altman's playbook, just like how he got the CEO job back.

deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]

eagerpace 2mo ago

This, and the books, and the government contracts, and the distillation… It’s like that one friend who complains how drama always finds them and they are clueless why.

deleted 2mo ago

[deleted]

georgemcbay 2mo ago

> Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. This isn't a "both sides" situation. OpenAI is posting drama blog posts. Apple isn't doing that. "Apple says" in the headline here actually means: Apple filed for a preliminary injunction with the court and since that is a public record we are reporting the contents of it.

sublinear 2mo ago

It's OpenAI still trying to maintain control of the narrative while they burn to the ground. For years they haven't really delivered while bullying anyone who doesn't have an "AI strategy". The media is happy to stoke the flames.

freejazz 2mo ago

>Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. Why? Apple surely doesn't want to and why should they?

thewebguyd 2mo ago
Huh? Apple is literally working through legal channels, the article is pulled from the court filings which are public record. OpenAI is the one making blog posts.

VCFundedGenYer 2mo ago

Why are you both-sidesing this? Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements. OpenAI is acting like a teenager posting screenshots of literal texts and being overall petulant. This is open and shut. The mature company will win this.

solfox 2mo ago
The lady doth protest too much, methinks
liamgm 2mo ago
Nah , OpenAI doing it right , defending its interest and valuable employee with both legal and public from competing company negative oppinion.
deleted 2mo ago
[deleted]
lightedman 2mo ago
"Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements." Apple does this to most any company that ends up with any of its former employees. It's basically expected. Apple is being the bully.
tjwebbnorfolk 2mo ago
Looking at things from multiple perspectives and trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice. I really hate that "both-sides" has become a copy-paste insult by ideologues.
- crazygringo 2mo ago
  It's a virtue when there is validity to both sides. But it's extremely harmful when there isn't. "Alice says murder is bad, while Bob says murder is a fun and healthy recreational activity. Trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice." See, it doesn't work.
  - 2mo ago

madeofpalk 2mo ago

I mean, they are dealing with it in the courts, right? This is the press picking up on public court filings https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73602437/49/apple-inc-v-liu/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73602437/49/apple-inc-v...

devsda 2mo ago

The whole affair and the blog post feels like proxy signal to potential investors from OpenAI that they have now developed/acquired tech that is worth enough to grab Apple's attention ?

nrmitchi 2mo ago

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither, pound the table." It's 2026; we can probably update "pound the table" to "pound social media"