4 ms·
It is a fun way to benchmark your system. I managed to get 4.1hz on my 13th gen i5 work laptop. Let's see an M-series chip blow that out of the water. ;) EDIT
by ColdStream 2mo ago
It is a fun way to benchmark your system. I managed to get 4.1hz on my 13th gen i5 work laptop.
Let's see an M-series chip blow that out of the water. ;)
EDIT - It was 4.1Hz in advance mode. Actually runs at between 22Hz and 44hz depending on each time I run it. Odd to have such a wide performance variation. I will just blame Windows and some power management setting/thermal throttling.
- jandrese 2mo agoMy very old i5-3570K on Firefox 153 is running this at 17.5Hz. I'm not sure why a much newer chip would be dramatically slower.
- va3ndf 2mo ago88Hz on the M4 Pro
- andrehacker 2mo agoI concur with that number for Chrome, then 70 Hz with Firefox 62 Hz with Safari
- ColdStream 2mo agoThere it is, about 4 times faster than my machine. The single core performance of the M-series is something special.
- andrehacker 2mo agoSo, yeah, this is wonderful since the ARM architecture (Acorn Risc Machine) is arguably derived from the 6502 by Sophie Wilkins and Steve Furber at Acorn Computers.
- djmips 2mo agoI'm seeing 34 Hz on a Ryzen 7 3600X 3.6 Ghz with Chrome. 47 Hz in Firefox.
- wvenable 2mo ago70hz to 75hz on 12th Gen Core i7-12700 Get about 10 more hz in Firefox than in Chrome which was unexpected.
- AnnikaL 2mo agoI got 22-33Hz on an AMD Ryzen 7640U on power-save mode and 50-55Hz on performance mode.
- phoghed 2mo ago62Hz on an iPhone 15 Pro
- elzbardico 2mo ago85Hz M3 Max
- ThrowawayTestr 2mo ago60Hz on my phone
- esikich 2mo agoPixel 6 - 40-50Hz
- p808 2mo ago[dead]
- flenserboy 2mo agoM4 Max, Brave — 93Hz highest, usually around 90Hz. On Advanced it started at 22Hz & steadily dropped from there into the single digits as it ran. Safari held around 62.xHz. On Advanced it started at 40Hz & also kept dropping.
- phs318u 2mo agoHigh 60's to 70 on a Firefox|Fedora|Ryzen AI 9 HX.
- ErroneousBosh 2mo agoLinux, Core i7-8700, Firefox, GTX1650, nothing special, and I'm getting 45-55Hz out of it. So you're probably not far off. I can't imagine more modern chips than mine would run it significantly faster, none of the "tweaks" would help here.