4 ms·

That's a big leap

• Lerc 3mo ago
  For strict definitiond of necessary (see also sufficient) this is correct. A is not necessary for B if a single instance of B exists without A. In colloquial terms it is frequently used to suggest a recommendation with an imperitive need. Different things for the same word. Only the former can be used to determine if something is necessary, the latter is a subjective assertion and can have no proof either way.
• satvikpendem 3mo ago
  It worked before so why would copyright be in any way necessary?
  • freejazz 3mo ago
    The idea that art was made at all contradicts a premise offered by no one
    • satvikpendem 3mo ago
      You just replied "and" so not sure what premise you're even offing then.
      • freejazz 3mo ago
        You've replied to several of my posts in this thread, no need to play a fool