3 ms·
People have been paid artists before copyright even existed, what some might call patronage.
by satvikpendem 3mo ago
People have been paid artists before copyright even existed, what some might call patronage.
- freejazz 3mo agoAnd?
- satvikpendem 3mo agoTherefore copyright is not necessary.
- freejazz 3mo agoThat's a big leap
- Lerc 3mo agoFor strict definitiond of necessary (see also sufficient) this is correct. A is not necessary for B if a single instance of B exists without A. In colloquial terms it is frequently used to suggest a recommendation with an imperitive need. Different things for the same word. Only the former can be used to determine if something is necessary, the latter is a subjective assertion and can have no proof either way.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoIt worked before so why would copyright be in any way necessary?
- freejazz 3mo agoThe idea that art was made at all contradicts a premise offered by no one
- satvikpendem 3mo agoYou just replied "and" so not sure what premise you're even offing then.
- freejazz 3mo agoYou've replied to several of my posts in this thread, no need to play a fool