3 ms·
> but at some point the model operators will offer this directly This is illegal in basically all of the developed world.
by disgruntledphd2 3mo ago
> but at some point the model operators will offer this directly
This is illegal in basically all of the developed world.
- oneeyedpigeon 3mo agoCopyright infringement used to be illegal in the developed world, then we started building exceptions for AI. There's no reason to expect this won't happen for advertising laws too.
- markovs_gun 3mo agoDoes that matter? AI companies seem more concerned with scaling at any cost regardless of laws broken because once they're big enough they're too central to the economy to face any real consequences.
- disgruntledphd2 3mo agoWeird, I thought I'd replied here. This is different as the victims of this crime would be large enterprises with lawyers on staff, rather than a diffuse agglomeration of all the world's writers.
- selicos 3mo agoA $1.5Bil settlement just went in on stolen content used for training. It's arguably many times larger in long term damages especially compared to investment into those who stole the content. If an AI company can scrape in billions of investment and keep going vs Facebook style "cost of doing business" fines, they will make that bet. If OpenAI can inject paid content, advice, misinformation, etc and keep operating or earn revenue today, it's worth doing. There are no ethics beyond optics. I'm not saying these AI company CEOs would sell their mothers for more runway cash. But also nobody has seen their mothers since the second Sunday in May.