3 ms·
> Meta's open-source approach makes this possible I'm sorry, was this article drafted in 2024 and never updated?
by sailingparrot 3mo ago
> Meta's open-source approach makes this possible
I'm sorry, was this article drafted in 2024 and never updated?
- hgoel 3mo agoThe models in question have source and weights available. AFAIK not fully FOSS because the weights require registration to access.
- kingstnap 3mo agoThis sort of random out of date comment is a common LLM writing trope. Though it is true that the segment anything model is open source. https://github.com/facebookresearch/sam3 https://github.com/facebookresearch/sam3 They have another with calling A100s modern. > A100 GPUs — the high-performance computing chips that power today's most advanced AI systems. They might not have written it with AI, but the article has a lot of em dashs and colons and not this but that statements.
- ipsum2 3mo agoSAM3.1 was released and open sourced March 2026. But what's the point of correcting you? People will continue to propagate their own lies.
- sailingparrot 3mo agoSure, I just find using OSS grand standing, and trying to educate the audience about the benefits of OSS a bit distasteful after Meta pulled away from OSS for their main flagship models.
- satvikpendem 3mo agoNone of their flagship models were open source.
- kevin_b_er 3mo agoThis is a false statement. > Your use of the SAM Materials will not involve or encourage others to reverse engineer, decompile or discover the underlying components of the SAM Materials. > Your use of the DINO Materials will not involve or encourage others to reverse engineer, decompile or discover the underlying components of the DINO Materials. It is not open source, thus the statement is false and a "lie". Nothing here is "open source".