3 ms·
Shells imo are legacy on legacy, I like bash and zsh, they’re nonsensical but they work. Powershell is undoubtedly saner, but I hate it. I think the whole conc
by hsbauauvhabzb 2mo ago
Shells imo are legacy on legacy, I like bash and zsh, they’re nonsensical but they work. Powershell is undoubtedly saner, but I hate it.
I think the whole concept could be rewritten from the ground up to be modern, but reaching critical mass and mvp is too damn difficult, and the majority of mac/Linux users probably don’t want it.
- anthk 2mo agoIt's the opposite. Plan9's rc(1) it's much saner than Bash, Ksh and PowerShell.
- inigyou 2mo agoIf you build it and it's better, they will come. None of us here are building it.
- hsbauauvhabzb 2mo agoThere are already alternative shells. I think there’s some stuff fairly deeply rooted into gnu that’s an ‘issue’ for rebuilding and turns an effort into a complete redesign, making the whole thing hard to achieve.
- MrBuddyCasino 2mo agoYou need a new distribution where that shell is the default. Boiling the ocean.
- MrBuddyCasino 2mo agohttps://www.nushell.sh/ https://www.nushell.sh/