3 ms·
Why not address the objective evidence the OP provided? To an impartial observer, it seemed quite overwhelming.
by hungryhobbit 3mo ago
Why not address the objective evidence the OP provided? To an impartial observer, it seemed quite overwhelming.
- leo3191 3mo agoI don't want to comment on and single out any one participant, but please check out the rubric on how we did the grading: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/overview https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/ove... Writeup quality is 20% of the total grade and there are other factors like dataset quality and results, which hold a much larger weight to the scores. This has been made public to participants since day 1 of the launch and we've adhered very closely to this rubric:)
- twerkmeister 3mo agoThe data set quality and much of the methodology is just as abysmal as the writeup... as pointed out in my second post: https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/discussion/724918#3499469 https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/kaggle-measuring-agi/dis... So it must have been the "results" that moved the needle :D