3 ms·
> Correlation != causation You obviously haven't read any of the source research. What point are you trying to make?
by kingkongrevenge 18y ago
> Correlation != causation
You obviously haven't read any of the source research. What point are you trying to make?
- endtime 18y agoMy point is that the article is poorly written. If there's real science backing up the article's points, great, but it sure doesn't give that impression. I don't have time to go off reading papers every time I read a bad article.