3 ms·
Hasn't been an issue at all for me, but in any case that's a separate issue. They removed compatibility with CMake earlier than 3.5, which is 10 years old at th
by IshKebab 3mo ago
Hasn't been an issue at all for me, but in any case that's a separate issue. They removed compatibility with CMake earlier than 3.5, which is 10 years old at this point. Support length is orthogonal to default behaviour evolution systems.
- mort96 3mo agoI never encounter things which need CMake <3.5 features. I constantly encounter things which declare their "minimum supported version" to be below 3.5. Which makes a lot of sense for those projects! They can be built with CMake 3.2 because they don't need anything introduced in a newer version, so why not declare 3.2 to be the earliest supported version? It's not their fault that CMake interprets "minimum supported version" weirdly?