2 ms·
Why would AI say that, when nearly every piece of training data is ever been fed would use milliseconds? I think much more likely that this is how the author th
by SamBam 3mo ago
Why would AI say that, when nearly every piece of training data is ever been fed would use milliseconds? I think much more likely that this is how the author thinks of it.
3 hundreds of a second == 33 Hz is very clean in my human brain.
- nnevatie 3mo agoNo one, ever, uses centiseconds in this context.
- tom_ 3mo agoCentiseconds was one of the ways time was measured on the BBC Micro. Your convenient options for accurately measuring the passage of time were vsyncs (50/sec), centiseconds (100/sec), microseconds (1,000,000/sec), or cycles (2,000,000/sec).
- jamesrandall 3mo agoIt's actually in the commented original disassembly and used in some of the original BBC documentation / writing. Which is how it ended up here - the article is a mix of things I wrote and things I asked an AI to write for me from the notes / findings from the archaeolgy.
- nnevatie 3mo agoOk, that makes sense. I was commenting from a modern gamedev context.
- jamesrandall 3mo agoThe weird world of retro game archaeology - it's genuinely fascinating.