3 ms·
What is your argument exactly? You establish, that it is virtuous to not fall for the hybris that claiming knowledge beyond the scope of your domain is. (i.e.
by NonHyloMorph 3mo ago
What is your argument exactly?
You establish, that it is virtuous to not fall for the hybris that claiming knowledge beyond the scope of your domain is. (i.e. the virtuous physisit who does not mistake his encounter with some institutional courses in chemistry for a foundation to transgress against "the chemist" by pretending to grasp chemistry like the latter does)
Now what is it exactly that you want to put forward regarding the faculty of philosophically trained cognition again?
- DoctorOetker 3mo ago"There is substance in philosophy, don't get me wrong, but just not that much of it"
- gopher_space 3mo agoStart thinking about where your numbers come from. Do some qualitative to quantitative conversions for a system with a feedback loop.
- NonHyloMorph 3mo agoThe more the studies of substances progress the more that concept slips through our fingers