4 ms·
So clearly when I go look back at the archives of Bernstein discussing 25519, I'm going to see him advocating for FFDH/25519 cascades, right? (If my subtext wa
by tptacek 4mo ago
So clearly when I go look back at the archives of Bernstein discussing 25519, I'm going to see him advocating for FFDH/25519 cascades, right?
(If my subtext wasn't clear, by the way: the implementation history of ECC is godawful.)
- g-b-r 4mo agoWas FFDH considered safe? > the implementation history of ECC is godawful You do know that new cryptographic code can be godawful, then?