3 ms·
I’m sorry but Nintendo don’t get a free pass in naming. Switch v switch Oled is as clear as Xbox series vs Xbox ones Nintendo, the company who released the Wii
by maccard 3mo ago
I’m sorry but Nintendo don’t get a free pass in naming. Switch v switch Oled is as clear as Xbox series vs Xbox ones
Nintendo, the company who released the Wii, wiiU, gameboy color, game boy advance, DS, 2DS, 3DS; all of which are similar but vaguely incompatible?
- DanHulton 3mo agoSwitch vs Switch OLED is fine, comparatively, because you are forgetting about the worst (non-Microsoft) naming choice of all consoles: the New 3DS. This lead to situations where you could have a new 3DS that wasn’t a new New 3DS, and didn’t play the games you bought with it. You could also, somehow, have an old New 3DS, a logical impossibility. Anyone in charge of naming anything that just calls it the “new” thing should be fired for not taking their job seriously.
- opan 3mo agoThe OLED Switch has the same specs and is the same gen, just a different screen. Like the Vita 1000 vs Vita 2000, they play the same games. Xbox One and Series are different gens.
- maccard 3mo agoWhy is switch oled ok but Xbox One X vs Xbox Series X not ok?
- zeratax 3mo agojust like the person you responded to already said: cos there is like basically no difference between the two. unless you care a lot about screens (in which case you will know what oled means) just get the cheaper one.
- freetonik 3mo agoDon’t forget the “New 3DS”.
- maccard 3mo agoWow how did I manage that.
- krige 3mo agoGood Ol' New Nintendo 2DS XL naming scheme.