3 ms·
What is the point of actively choosing a web framework in the age of LLMs?
by podnami 3mo ago
What is the point of actively choosing a web framework in the age of LLMs?
- haute_cuisine 3mo agoThe point is the same as in pre-LLM.
- mhitza 3mo agoStronger foundation (as to mean better tested), less accidental complexity of reinventing everything, transferability of knowledge, easier onboarding and review of changes. Your argument is a mirror of the snark question "why don't LLMs write in assembly?" for those not looking at the output at all.
- the_gipsy 3mo agoI haven't tried it, but Elm might be a really good fit for LLMs, because it forbids taking shortcuts.
- maicben 3mo agoIt works really great with LLMs, it introduces less bugs compared with other languages
- bbg2401 3mo agoProfessional diligence, perhaps? A desire to not be blindly led into the kind of narrow, often first-party stack which is so often proposed by Claude Code? With all due respect, not everyone is afflicted with the lack of care sufficient to allow them to launch vibe coded apps as low quality as https://podnami.com https://podnami.com. Considered technology choices are one such aspect of the practice of caring about what you're building.
- pohl 3mo agoIf anything, LLMs make it easier to choose from a broad set of options. The tradeoffs are the same as pre-LLM days, but the learning curve is more favorable.
- solumunus 3mo agoStatically typed languages with compiler hints are the absolute best languages for LLM's to work with. Successful compilation is incredible feedback, and it basically just means that there is a higher chance that the feature is in a complete and working state at the end of each agent iteration.
- akst 3mo agoSorry buddy this is hacker news, you probably meant to enter your prompt here --> claude.ai
- mmmmbbbhb 3mo agoI am also confused by this, and not just for web, but any dev technology. I personally couldn't care less what the llm is writing in.