3 ms·
it could almost certainly regurgitate something like minetest its in the training data, probably many times, and it was then, too
by 8note 3mo ago
it could almost certainly regurgitate something like minetest
its in the training data, probably many times, and it was then, too
- latentsea 3mo agoAnd that's exactly why 3 years ago we saw people one shotting it in 45 minutes :)
- staticman2 3mo ago"Some idiot on Twitter did a game tech demo" has been a thing since, like GPT 3.5 or 4.0?
- latentsea 3mo agoIt has. We can see 3.5 started with text adventure games https://medium.com/@duncanariey/using-chatgpt-to-make-the-ittiest-bittiest-text-based-adventure-game-f642e8da4dad https://medium.com/@duncanariey/using-chatgpt-to-make-the-it... and with 4.0 it moved up to pong https://x.com/skirano/status/1635736107949195278 https://x.com/skirano/status/1635736107949195278 As the generations increase, so too has the complexity of the games it can one-shot.
- staticman2 3mo agoBut nobody has nailed "this is a game anyone wants to play" or "professional game development life cycles are shorter" so it's not particularly impressive. I'm still waiting for any evidence of LLM economic impact in the real world.
- latentsea 3mo agoYeah, well I doubt any economic impact will from LLMs will ever come. I doubt anyone is working on nailing those things as we speak. I doubt the results my team and I are getting with agentic engineering are real. I doubt anyone can take increasingly better tools and translate that to economic value.
- staticman2 3mo agoIf you're doing such amazing things why the need to gush about Minecraft tweets?
- latentsea 3mo agoWhy wouldn't I be? Those demos are put out by non-engineer AI-bros who start from a blank slate and just test raw one-shot performance of the model. In comparison I'm aware of how much additional performance you can extract out of models with a team of professional engineers that are balls-deep in harness engineering. That delta is very large. It's exciting.