3 ms·
I was wrong, I thought they would only go for B2B already. But instead they will remove it from the subscription and price it at 50$/mtok. Compared to GLM-5.2 f
by pheggs 4mo ago
I was wrong, I thought they would only go for B2B already. But instead they will remove it from the subscription and price it at 50$/mtok. Compared to GLM-5.2 for 4.40$ that's quite a gap
- olcarl75 4mo agohow does GLM-5.2 fare against fable/opus 4.8? I am thinking about moving my 5x subscription either towards the GPT equivalent or the GLM one (I heard GLM gives you 20x the token usage for the same price of anthropics 5x)
- pheggs 4mo agoI find it difficult to compare LLMs in general. It will do better in some cases, worse in others. As far as I see it, most of it is marketing. You can try it out extremely cheaply though through their API and OpenCode. I personally would recommend it.
- olcarl75 4mo agothis makes sense. I will give it a try via opencode and see how does it do.
- solenoid0937 4mo agoGLM is Sonnet 5 level, maybe slightly below. Probably Opus 4.5 level if you want an Opus comparison. It's a good model that gets things done but it's just not comparable to Opus and a very very far cry from Fable. It does poorly with long horizon or very complex agentic tasks, but it's great and even cheaper than Sonnet for quick sessions.
- pheggs 4mo agoI dont buy that, mainly because in blind tests where people dont know which model was used and choose a result, this does not seem to hold true