3 ms·
... does it? Are you seeing something I'm not seeing? Number one is that this just doesn't appear to be true (non-lite versions beat it across the board it seem
by uejfiweun 3mo ago
... does it? Are you seeing something I'm not seeing? Number one is that this just doesn't appear to be true (non-lite versions beat it across the board it seems), number two is that this specifically is a low-cost bulk model and not a SOTA frontier model, of course the benchmarks are lower.
- timr 3mo agoIt’s not a universal win, but grok outperforms on 2 of the metrics, and is close on a third. Image editing: banana 1308, grok 1329 Image generation: banana 1251, grok 1174 (grok loses, but is close) Cost: banana 3.4 cents, grok 2 cents Grok is a good image model, so it isn’t totally surprising, but it’s weird that they’d pick a set of metrics where they’re not the clear winner.