5 ms·
Spot the odd one out: > Some of its key issues include lowered wages for politicians, ending the tax payer funding of various sculptures, monuments and art, la
by ZeroGravitas 4mo ago
Spot the odd one out:
> Some of its key issues include lowered wages for politicians, ending the tax payer funding of various sculptures, monuments and art, large scale remigration, a stricter immigration policy, and free dental care.
- throwitaway222 4mo ago[flagged]
- pesus 4mo agoSource that every single left wing party in the 90s wanted to get rid of every single person of a non-white background?
- throwitaway222 4mo ago[flagged]
- pesus 4mo ago[flagged]
- throwitaway222 4mo ago[flagged]
- pesus 4mo agoWhat? That's what the party is in favor of, and the thing you said every single left wing party from the 90s supported. Why can't you back up what you say? Is it because the Democratic Party did not support ethnic cleansing in the 90s?
- DaSHacka 4mo ago[flagged]
- throwitaway222 4mo ago[flagged]
- maximilianburke 4mo ago>In a podcast segment about immigration and deportations Allard stated his opinion and said that "They will also be forced to leave, even if they are born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedish." [54] from the wikipedia page
- lorecore 4mo agoYour anecdote is not data and your family's views are not representative of left wing political positions.
- throwitaway222 4mo agoThat's fine, I was offering my opinion. For some reason people on HN want a double blind study that's been re-run 300 times since the 60s and stamped by the president for proof of anything these days.
- LaurensBER 4mo agoSplit from: Left Party So basically the left but with a stricter view on immigration?
- trenchgun 4mo agoI think mass deportation of people with wrong skin color goes beyond "stricter view on immigration" >large scale remigration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remigration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remigration
- DaSHacka 4mo agoIt's not based on skin color though, its migration status. Even people of the same complexion can be a net negative to the country as they feel the majority of recent immigrants are.
- therouwboat 4mo agothey probably forget all those other promises once they get to power
- threetonesun 4mo agoWe want everyone here to be exactly like us, but we do recognize we have bad teeth.
- honeycrispy 4mo agoNo, we just want them to not hate us and our culture. People in general are tired of being tolerant to the intolerant.
- nitnelave 4mo agoFor context, from wiki: > Remigration is a far-right concept referring to ethnic cleansing via mass deportation of non-white minority populations [...] to their place of racial ancestry
- Auracle 4mo ago[flagged]
- Atotalnoob 4mo agoAh grokipedia, the fountain of unbiased knowledge. It’s pretty radicle to remove people who have lived in your country for generations.
- Auracle 4mo ago[flagged]
- pcl 4mo agoFollowing your lead, I haven’t researched Örebro’s proposed policies. But I would find it surprising if “large scale remigration” really was scoped to an everyman’s definition of “few years”. I would expect that their targets for “large scale” exceed three or four years’ worth of immigration.
- Auracle 4mo agoEven if you scope it out to "everyone that's not a citizen or has the equivalent of a green card," is that so evil? If a country accepts immigrants they should be able to send them back at will unless they become citizens. That shouldn't be controversial. You can argue if it's a good or bad policy, of course, but it's not ethically wrong to do so. Yes, they'll be in more danger and have worse lives when they go back to wherever they came from, but again - a country should exist to serve its citizens, not the entire world. It's not sustainable.
- KaiserPro 4mo ago> large scale remigration which is literally kicking out people who don't look or sounds like me, out of the country. Whenever that has happened it has been rather bad for most parties.
- DaSHacka 4mo ago> which is literally kicking out people who don't look or sounds like me, out of the country. Or, more accurately, people who weren't born there (particularly first generation immigrants). No one's talking about legitimately doing deportations via family guy race cards.
- xdennis 4mo ago[flagged]
- tacticalturtle 4mo agoImmigration sounds good for Sweden then, because they have a fertility rate of 1.42, well below replacement. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/25/sweden-pm-ivf-re-election-record-low-birthrate https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/may/25/sweden-pm-ivf-...
- ReptileMan 4mo agoRobots are also advancing fast. They have all the upsides and none of the downsides of mass migration.
- dijit 4mo agoTo understand why there might be a desire to limit spending on art; There was a recent case where city of Malmo was building a hospital; during the building of the hospital it was decided that a splice of the oldest tree in the world would be installed. A very expensive life-support system was developed and an enormous amount of money paid for the splice. (not including the life support system, which was also an inordinate amount). The tree didn't take, and needs to be replaced. It's called "Spruce Time": https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/region-skane-har-lagt-79-miljoner-pa-klonad-gran https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/skane/region-skane-har-lag...
- fc417fc802 4mo agoI think government art projects the western world over would fare better if they went through a reasonably local direct democracy type process. Instead we get unelected bureaucrats with absolutely bizarre tastes commissioning wildly expensive projects that the majority don't really appreciate. Even though that only describes a minority of cases I think it shouldn't be any surprise that it results in backlash and defunding.
- justin66 4mo agoI hope you don't think that is the odd one out.