4 ms·

it won't be monetized so there's zero incentive to upload AI slop to Tidal

• suyash 4mo ago
  They say only wholly produced music using AI can't be monetized, nothing stopping it's 95% AI and 5% Human. Also no concerete definitions of what that even means.
  • Imustaskforhelp 4mo ago
    I think that they mentioned both wholly produced music or substantially produced music. I think that it will be a fuzzy line but for example in the case of 95% AI and 5% human probably won't work.
• have_faith 4mo ago
  Why would someone doing that voluntarily tag their content as AI? they can make money by hiding it.
• wakamoleguy 4mo ago
  There is only zero incentive if the filter detects AI music reliably. It's still a race between effective detection and cost to generate content, isn't it?
  • pier25 4mo ago
    Suno et al don't really have a incentive to hide the fact that their tracks are generated using AI. Quite the contrary, the only way they won't get sued to death by UMG and the other big labels is to disclose AI generated tracks.
    • copperx 4mo ago
      Doesn't Warner Music own Suno?
• DrewADesign 4mo ago
  Unless they directly embed promotions in it. I could see this being an avenue for brand-derived fake artists. I wonder if they already have a policy for that and I wonder why it wouldn’t apply to, say, the beastie boys talking about adidas.
• yawnr 4mo ago
  It won't be monetized until they create a new monetization policy where they get a greater revenue share from it.