4 ms·
> Then why is "glass the entire country" not an option? It is an option, but civilians bear most of the cost of it. That being said, I do think more could have
by drnick1 4mo ago
> Then why is "glass the entire country" not an option?
It is an option, but civilians bear most of the cost of it. That being said, I do think more could have been done militarily. The U.S. should have continued combat operations for at least a few more weeks and taken what is left of ballistic missiles, drones and arms facilities, etc. Striking dual-use infrastructure such as bridges and railroads is also fair game.
- orwin 4mo agoThe US kept hitting civilian targets and blasting about it, so they already did that. When Arab hit civilian targets, it's terrorism, when the US does, it's freedom. I personally fail to understand the difference, but I'm an europoor
- dotancohen 4mo agoThe difference is that Arab doctrine is to deliberately target civilians, whereas Western doctrine attack military targets but accept that there may be unintended civilian casualties along the way.
- orwin 4mo agoSchools, hospitals, desalination plants, museums and churches, those well know dual use infrastructure. So sad they were unlucky civilians there.
- dotancohen 4mo agoIt is extremely sad that the Hamas, the Islamic Jihad, the Popular Front for Palestine Liberation, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, the Popular Resistance Committee, the Mujahideen Brigades, the Huthis, and Hezbollah see fit to use these structures to launch attacks against Israel. I highly suggest taking your complaints to them.