3 ms·
It is a problem because people will talk about what AI can do implying that an LLM can do that thing, making it seem like a pure LLM can do almost anything. On
by georgeecollins 4mo ago
It is a problem because people will talk about what AI can do implying that an LLM can do that thing, making it seem like a pure LLM can do almost anything. On the other hand people will say AI will never be able to do X because an LLM can’t do that thing well natively. AI has become too vague of a term to be useful.
- pixl97 4mo agoWe're relearning that intelligence is spikey, and that different things that we consider 'intelligent' can have vastly different capabilities.
- bigstrat2003 4mo agoWe're learning that people are way too lax with where they apply the term "intelligent". LLMs aren't remotely intelligent, but people are trying to ride the hype train and call them intelligence.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- subygan 4mo agothis is just false. by any meaningful measure of intelligence. the latest models are much smarter than the bulk of the population. how would you define intelligence?
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- YurgenJurgensen 4mo ago“Intelligence is the ability to learn.” That is a meaningful measure of intelligence that every LLM completely fails at.
- falcor84 4mo ago> LLMs aren't remotely intelligent Maybe I'm just significantly and unrepresentatively unlucky, but Claude is significantly more intelligent than the average human around me on most any metric I can think of.
- quantum_state 4mo agoVery much indeed. The term itself is not properly defined, strictly speaking.