> even if you’ve solved a problem, often the proofs are incredibly long and complex and require an extensive amount of time spent by peers to review it. I hope

> even if you’ve solved a problem, often the proofs are incredibly long and complex and require an extensive amount of time spent by peers to review it. I hope mathematicians have the self-respect of not establishing rules such as "if a proof is longer than X, break it up in smaller ones, otherwise it'll be outright rejected".