3 ms·

>This is regulatory capture in action. Isnt this all export control based? If so its not regulatory capture for a few reasons. If not disregard this. 1) new e

>This is regulatory capture in action. Isnt this all export control based? If so its not regulatory capture for a few reasons. If not disregard this. 1) new entrants wont get export controlled because they arent leading edge 2) a new company could just implement KYC. It could even be a competitive advantage (Anthropic wont or cant)

thayne 4mo ago
> Only companies approved by the government will get access. There is no process for individual users to get access to the new model. That sounds like more than just export control. This means that big company A that the president has a business interest in could get access to the most powerful AIs, while a startup competing with it doesn't.
- gwerbin 4mo ago
  It's worth keeping in mind the broader context here politically. The president and his cabinet are generally pursuing policies of a strong unitary executive branch that centralizes "technocratic" functions under the control of politicians and political appointees. The majority in Congress doesn't appear to mind and seems to be actively sitting back from legislating on topics like this. The overall effect is that of creating a system in which the rules are deliberately uncertain and the only reliable way to get approval is by aligning yourself or your organization politically. It's a powerful technique for ensuring political compliance in the corporate world.
  - mullingitover 4mo ago
    > The president and his cabinet are generally pursuing policies of a strong unitary executive branch Or, and this is common knowledge, they're just straight up looting.
    - gwerbin 4mo ago
      Well yeah, but that's the point of the whole unitary executive thing. Thete are quick cash grabs happening all over the place of course, but they are also setting up for a long-term systemization of corruption, backed by a radicalized narrow majority voter base. It's clear that they believe they will win the midterm elections, or that the opposition won't be able or willing to stop them meaningfully, and then win the next presidential election too.

thayne 4mo ago

> Only companies approved by the government will get access. There is no process for individual users to get access to the new model. That sounds like more than just export control. This means that big company A that the president has a business interest in could get access to the most powerful AIs, while a startup competing with it doesn't.

gwerbin 4mo ago
It's worth keeping in mind the broader context here politically. The president and his cabinet are generally pursuing policies of a strong unitary executive branch that centralizes "technocratic" functions under the control of politicians and political appointees. The majority in Congress doesn't appear to mind and seems to be actively sitting back from legislating on topics like this. The overall effect is that of creating a system in which the rules are deliberately uncertain and the only reliable way to get approval is by aligning yourself or your organization politically. It's a powerful technique for ensuring political compliance in the corporate world.
- mullingitover 4mo ago
  > The president and his cabinet are generally pursuing policies of a strong unitary executive branch Or, and this is common knowledge, they're just straight up looting.
  - gwerbin 4mo ago
    Well yeah, but that's the point of the whole unitary executive thing. Thete are quick cash grabs happening all over the place of course, but they are also setting up for a long-term systemization of corruption, backed by a radicalized narrow majority voter base. It's clear that they believe they will win the midterm elections, or that the opposition won't be able or willing to stop them meaningfully, and then win the next presidential election too.