5 ms·
If it's a new generation why isn't it GPT-6?
by ChrisLTD 4mo ago
If it's a new generation why isn't it GPT-6?
- win311fwg 4mo agoIt does not introduce incompatibilities with earlier 5.x models? Frontier models are at a point now that there will never be a need for another major version bump, aside from those chasing marketing gimmicks. They are smart enough to adapt.
- ChrisLTD 4mo agoWhat would it mean to be incompatible with the other 5.x models?
- paxys 4mo agoNew request/response schema, new capabilities, or really anything that would break your existing workflows if you changed “5.5” to “5.6” in your application. There have been many leaps forward in the past - tool calling, reasoning, agentic loops etc. 5.6 doesn’t have any of this. More intelligence doesn’t necessarily warrant a major version bump.
- jurgenburgen 4mo agoOnly speaks Klingon
- malnourish 4mo agoA major bump will be warranted if/when we can truly separate prompt from data.
- win311fwg 4mo agoThat is a different product line. It may be recorded as a version bump for marketing purposes, as already mentioned, but semantically begins at 0.
- peab 4mo agonot true. multimodality is still far from being solved
- charcircuit 4mo agoWhy would incompatibilities have anything to do with a major version bump?
- alcasa 4mo agoThey forgot how to do pretraining.
- cleaning 4mo ago5.5 was a new pretraining run.
- paxys 4mo agoGiven the expectations everyone has created GPT-6 has to pretty much be AGI.
- tasuki 4mo agoWhat is your definition of AGI that the current LLMs don't fit?
- paxys 4mo agoAs the old saying goes, I’ll know it when I see it. The current 5.x generation isn’t it.
- gordonhart 4mo agoAutonomously Generating Income (which is why it will never be released to the general public)
- koolala 4mo agoHopefully it stands for AC Generation Improvements. If it prioritizes income it will bleed the planet dry. It needs to solve how expensive our cost is on the planet first or its entire existence was a mistake.
- ThrowawayTestr 4mo agoWhen it understands why 6 7 is funny
- isomorphic_duck 4mo agoContinual Learning? Why is this even a question? Isn’t it a well-known glaring issue with the current models? They cannot learn/adapt to new skills (in any permanent sense) once they are deployed.
- FromTheFirstIn 4mo agoYou’d have to really stretch the definition of AGI to make the current models fit