3 ms·
Feds deny Polestar authorization to sell cars in US from model year 2027
- qsxfthnkp2322 3mo agoSurprised they were here in the first place since the USA needs to protect its own car industry. Sad because polestar seems genuinely good from the little I’ve seen about them.
- pylua 3mo agoI wonder why the U.S. is only interested in protecting its car industry and not others.
- jleyank 3mo agoIt still has a car industry. Not the best nor the worst choices and some are even made in the us I think. Some in Canada/Mexico at least at the moment.
- gonzalohm 3mo agoBecause of lobbying. That's usually the answer when policies don't make sense
- qsxfthnkp2322 3mo agoBoth oil and gas lobbying against BEV and USA auto manufacturers who outsource or offshore all their parts already. USA auto makers can’t compete at China Ev (subsidized?) pricing and probably quality.
- pylua 3mo agoYeah, not many industries can compete but I don’t understand the fixation on only preserving auto.
- cyanydeez 3mo agoChina's EV market plus more consumer protections would still beat all the other EVs out there.
- Slow_Hand 3mo agoI wouldn’t mind more foreign car companies if it means alternatives to what’s being offered today. I don’t see why they should be restricted if most industries don’t also have similar restrictions.
- jerlam 3mo agoWe need these foreign companies here so that we can learn from them to modernize our manufacturing. Not just cars either. That's how China got started - foreign companies were allowed to partner with and invest in domestic companies. Over time, those domestic companies took over and helped China become the manufacturing powerhouse it is now, not just in China, but globally.
- wilkommen 3mo agoCouldn't they have just mandated that Polestar cars in the US must not be able to connect to the internet? That would pretty much negate any potential foreign threat related to "connected cars". Just make them... not connected.
- AlotOfReading 3mo agoI think that these protectionist measures are ultimately going to hurt the competitiveness of the US auto industry. Exports and international sales are a big, but not overwhelming part of the revenue for major manufacturers. It's something like 20% of GM's revenue, and maybe 35% of Ford's. When they can't compete internationally, it's small enough that executives will convince themselves to focus on their core market in the US. That will in turn lead to production volumes (and hence economies of scale) slowly dropping. Vehicles from American brands are going to become even more unaffordable than they already are, At least we can hope that newer manufacturers like Slate and Rivian will keep things reasonable, and major foreign brands like Kia and Toyota might bring the fruits of their knowledge from competing internationally to their US models/factories. I'm not hopeful for the long term future of big three though, especially Stellantis and GM.
- DiabloD3 3mo agoIn a way, its funny you say Toyota is the foreign brand. Of domestically produced GM, Chrysler, or Ford vehicles, most are shipped to foreign customers; of domestically sold GM, Chrysler, or Ford vehicles, most are manufactured by foreign factories. They do some assembly locally, but the majority of it is of foreign manufacture. However, Toyota manufacturers most of their domestic sales domestically, and operate one of the largest car manufacturing plants in the US, only slightly below Ford's US plant that largely exports to Europe. Of domestically made cars that are domestically sold, Toyota dominates that. BMW and Nissan also operate plants in the US for domestic use. I agree that this backwards Reaganite behavior is just going to further shut the Detroit Three out of any future. They're already on the way out, a slow decline since they left the US, but this is going to finally finish those zombies off.
- roxolotl 3mo agoYea my father is looking for a new car, sedan, and will only buy American. Except American owned companies don’t really make sedans anymore. So he’s unsure what to do. I told him basically any Toyota sedan he buys would be made in the US and it blew his mind. I don’t understand how people who have strong opinions on these sorts of things don’t also do any research at all into their opinion.
- quantum_state 3mo agoThe US consumers are now becoming more and more like captive preys ... in the names of whatever special interest groups would make up ... so sad and outrageous!
- bashtoni 3mo agoAre they going to be banning Volvo too given they have the same parent company? It'll be interesting to see how far this protectionism goes.
- singleshot_ 3mo agoThe article discusses the answer to your question.
- JumpCrisscross 3mo ago> the US Commerce Department has declined to authorize imports of new Polestars from model year 2027 onward as part of a rule banning connected cars from automakers with Chinese links Would the cars be allowed if connectivity were cut off? That could be a net win for consumers.
- ImPostingOnHN 3mo agoNo. The action is rooted in protectionism of corporations that give money to the president and/or publicly praise him. If the pretext was mooted, the two of them would find a new pretext, and pretend the previous one never existed. This pattern has repeated countless times in the last year or so.
- corymayfield 3mo agoI'm not sure how this would even work as most cars have Chinese links in some form. Under this logic popular car brands that would be removed are Volvo, Polestar, Zeek, Lotus, MG, BYD, Smart, LDV, Chery, GWM, Jaecoo/Omoda, Leapmotor, Xpeng, etc - these are only off the top of my head. How would it even work with Tesla (America's golden child) - a large amount of their cars are built in China with strong links to the Chinese?
- reverius42 3mo agoMaybe they'll go by whether the majority ownership is Chinese? In that case Volvo and Polestar (and probably all the others on your list) would be banned (if they're being consistent), but not Tesla.