3 ms·
Yes, they ran a leading editorial titled "Why war would be justified", arguing that confronting Saddam Hussein was "the least bad of the limited range of availa
by andsoitis 4mo ago
Yes, they ran a leading editorial titled "Why war would be justified", arguing that confronting Saddam Hussein was "the least bad of the limited range of available options".
However, they reversed position in 2007, calling the invasion a debacle.
- crote 4mo agoIt would've been more surprising if they hadn't reversed their position, well after it became painfully clear to everyone that the war had been a terrible idea.
- dingaling 4mo agoThe idea of overthrowing a vicious dictator can't really be wrong in any moral sense. In terms of realpolitik or execution it can be.