3 ms·
Maybe that's why the 512GB RAM models are gone: they opt to pull a model without further announcement rather than increase its prices.
by WhyNotHugo 4mo ago
Maybe that's why the 512GB RAM models are gone: they opt to pull a model without further announcement rather than increase its prices.
- giancarlostoro 4mo agoIt was probably two birds one stone: they could use that RAM for other more likely to be purchased models, and the loss from selling 512GB of "pre-RAM-AI-tax" costs would have been too high. They would have certainly sold those models though.
- Lalabadie 4mo agoIt's also a financial optimization: Even with the very expensive RAM upgrade prices, it's way better to use the same memory chips to manufacture and sell four Mac Minis or two Mac Studios, rather than a single high-RAM unit.
- hajile 4mo agoDemand for 512+gb hasn't gone away though. I suspect we'll see M5/M6 Ultra later this year with 512gb-1tb of ram going for the biggest premium we've ever seen from the company.
- bigyabai 4mo ago> I suspect we'll see M5/M6 Ultra later this year with 512gb-1tb of ram I suspect the opposite. 512gb of LPDDR5X is enough memory to make sixty four Macbook Neos. Apple's HPC/server audience is not very large or demanding, it seems likely that they will avoid memory upgrades during the shortage to focus on delivering value to low-end consumers and driving service sales.
- vb-8448 4mo agoProbably the first >20k$ macbook ever ...