3 ms·

no way, the contents of "reasoning_summary" are summarized? fyi openai does the same; not really surprising or particularly evil

• deleted 4mo ago
  [deleted]
• knollimar 4mo ago
  Not evil but full of hubris
  • anuramat 4mo ago
    I don't see any hubris in competition
    • knollimar 4mo ago
      "Our models are so much better than our competition that we would rather deliver a worse product to consumers than let people copy it" is how I read the stance
      • anuramat 4mo ago
        > so much better it's enough for them to be slightly better for this to make sense; I'm not sure most people would consider this to be a worse product either -- it's annoying for devs and makes hotswapping models more of a problem, but who has the time to read CoT as a user?
      • handoflixue 4mo ago
        It seems weird to call it "hubris" when you have proof that multiple competitors have tried to do similar distillations. Every closed-source project and really the vast majority of commercial exercises involve a large amount of "prevent consumers from copying this" - Coca Cola's formula is trademarked, Windows is copyrighted, etc.