It seems reasonable to me too. It's good and proper for the government to tell people that certain foods are better than others, even when the bad foods are pop

It seems reasonable to me too. It's good and proper for the government to tell people that certain foods are better than others, even when the bad foods are popular. Eating a pile of candy every day isn't a personal lifestyle choice we're required to respect and encourage; it's bad for people who do it and bad for society to have lots of people doing it. What I don't see is how anyone could argue this isn't paternalism.