4 ms·
Regardless of whether you're correct, that wasn't the subject of the article.
by monooso 4mo ago
Regardless of whether you're correct, that wasn't the subject of the article.
- Jiro 4mo agoIt's implied by the article that there wouldn't be much opposition to immigration without big tech. That isn't true if there is widespread opposition to immigration anyway and the government broke its promise about dealing with it.
- SpicyLemonZest 4mo agoThe article specifically disclaims that. "To identify Musk as the cause of the riots is to airbrush the messy reality. Comforting, but ultimately deluding."
- kakistocrats 4mo agoThe project was started by wealth offshoring groups on the Isle of Man that were afraid their loopholes would finally be closed, so if it could deliver on anything it claimed in order to get adequate votes then that would be coincidental. (The structure of EU and Schengen law also meant that leaving was the most likely way to raise the percentage of illegal immigrants making it to the UK.)
- 4dregress 4mo agoAgain, interesting to see a new account being used to make this comment.
- kakistocrats 4mo agoI also find your account interesting as a choice. If were not going to swap that account, I would at least update the "about" to reflect the risks from a Musk worth over a trillion.