3 ms·
There is no moat around what they are doing really and they have competitors in all these sectors. All it takes is another administration to come in with a brai
by asdff 4mo ago
There is no moat around what they are doing really and they have competitors in all these sectors. All it takes is another administration to come in with a brain and a spine to not just hand contract blindly to Elon.
- grosswait 4mo agoWho do you think the viable alternatives are? Be realistic.
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- nradov 4mo agoWhich competitors? Blue Origin and Amazon are trying but they're way behind on space launch capability, and still using SpaceX to launch a lot of their TeraWave and Kuiper satellites. Arianespace and ULA seem to have given up and aren't even trying to compete.
- WalterBright 4mo agoBlindly? SpaceX launches cost only 10% of what NASA was previously spending.
- rayiner 4mo agoNot to mention it had to pay Russia $4 billion for seats on Soyez flights to ferry astronauts to the ISS.
- loandbehold 4mo ago"No moat" are you serious? It took SpaceX 20 years to develop reusable rocket launch tech they have and everyone else who is working on it is decade behind. Falcon Heavy per kg cost to LEO is 25 times lower than what SLS can provide. Freaking 25 times!
- satvikpendem 4mo agoNo moat lol, hardware has much more of a moat than all these SaaS companies