4 ms·

It's possible we're at the point now where it fools me, but I didn't see it that way. I think more evidence against would be the fact that the author discloses

It's possible we're at the point now where it fools me, but I didn't see it that way. I think more evidence against would be the fact that the author discloses genAI usage in another article [0] and provides their own version of the same [1]. [0] https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/14/labor-pressures-causing-market-distortion-and-a-minimally-invasive-solution/ https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/14/labor-pressures-causing-... [1] https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/07/labor-is-a-market-distortion/ https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/07/labor-is-a-market-distor...

svnt 4mo ago
The one they claim is in their voice [1] has zero of the tells I am referring to. You can compare and contrast it with your fully/generated reference 0 (although that is fable and I have little experience reading its writing it seems to use many similar comventions) and the title piece and see what I mean. [1] https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/07/labor-is-a-market-distortion/ https://wilsoniumite.com/2026/06/07/labor-is-a-market-distor...