2 ms·
Since Let's Encrypt wasn't down most of the day if would be helpful if you could update the title to reflect that.
by jaas 4mo ago
Since Let's Encrypt wasn't down most of the day if would be helpful if you could update the title to reflect that.
- widdakay 4mo agoI updated the title. Let me know if you think it's more accurate. It did appear as down for me though.
- jaas 4mo agoYeah, thanks
- widdakay 4mo agoI did not intend this to hit the top of the front page lol. I just posted it and then came back 15 minutes later to it having exploded.
- jaas 4mo agoNo worries
- taspeotis 4mo agoThanks for securing the web
- sam_lowry_ 4mo agoThank them for making the web depend on a single US-based shady org, as if DNS was not enough.
- cpach 4mo agoFeel free to launch your own CA.
- sam_lowry_ 4mo agoNo-no, I would rather go back to the good old HTTP/1.1. P.S. JS injection into TCP packets and other meddling with passthrough data should be banned legally, not technically via encryption.
- soco 4mo agoI wish you good luck in court trying to get compensation for the damage you've got through a JS injection attack. Because people prefer to lock their valuables instead of constantly having to identify and sue thieves.
- sam_lowry_ 4mo agoNot court, regulation. Wanna be a carrier? Then don't meddle with traffic. Otherwise, you are liable for all the child porn and drug trade that happen to cross your boundary.
- soco 4mo agoRight, we actually agree on this. And where is regulation enforced? In courts. Who says the provider is liable? A court. This was my point: not locking your house means a lot of processing to get back to the place where you have been before - if it can ever happen. And I'd very much not go through a whole trial...
- sam_lowry_ 4mo agoRegulation is enforced in courts only in the US, heh.
- Natfan 4mo agoam i a carrier when i host my own wifi network?