3 ms·

I agree but please, provide citations instead of a question mark, to make what you believe is obvious actually in fact obvious.

• dgellow 4mo ago
  I think the question mark is good enough for such an absurd claim. If the author cares they can find quotes with no effort
  • cwmoore 4mo ago
    I don’t see any?
  • allarm 4mo ago
    I don't think so?
• Telaneo 4mo ago
  > New combinations of circumstances — that is, new cases — constantly call for the application, which means in truth the extension of old principles; or, it may be, even for the thinking out of some new principle, in harmony with the general spirit of the law, fitted to meet the novel requirements of the time. Law And Public Opinion In England, page 361 -> https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.40146/page/n381/mode/2up https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.40146/page/n38...